Washington St.
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
49  Michael Williams JR 31:34
61  John Whelan SR 31:38
144  Sam Levora JR 32:00
211  Nathan Wadhwani SO 32:16
219  Chandler Teigen SO 32:17
373  Justin Janke FR 32:40
383  Nathan Tadesse SO 32:41
400  Paul Ryan SO 32:43
496  Jake Finney SO 32:55
535  Jackson Haselnus JR 32:59
National Rank #17 of 312
West Region Rank #6 of 32
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 84.1%
Most Likely Finish 18th at Nationals


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.5%
Top 10 at Nationals 9.1%
Top 20 at Nationals 57.0%


Regional Champion 0.3%
Top 5 in Regional 40.3%
Top 10 in Regional 100.0%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Michael Williams John Whelan Sam Levora Nathan Wadhwani Chandler Teigen Justin Janke Nathan Tadesse Paul Ryan Jake Finney Jackson Haselnus
Sundodger Invitational 09/17 682 31:41 32:10 32:21 32:18 32:33 32:30 32:36 33:11 33:01
Joe Piane Invitational (Blue) 09/30 556 31:39 31:29 32:00 32:13 32:45 32:54 32:47 32:35
UW Invitational 10/01 1066 32:40 33:04
Nuttycombe Wisconsin Invitational 10/14 448 31:10 31:24 31:57 32:21 31:56 33:01 32:58
Pac-12 Conference 10/28 486 31:49 31:51 31:36 31:52 32:23 32:35 32:12 32:19 32:32 32:50
West Region Championships 11/11 491 31:36 31:39 32:02 32:17 31:48 32:51 32:38





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 84.1% 17.8 457 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.5 1.0 1.7 2.6 2.9 2.8 4.0 4.4 4.8 4.4 5.8 4.7 6.1 6.0 5.2 4.9 3.6 4.5 3.8 2.5 2.3 2.2 1.1 1.2 0.8 0.3
Region Championship 100% 5.7 157 0.3 2.3 5.1 11.1 21.7 37.8 13.2 6.2 2.0 0.7



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Michael Williams 91.2% 52.7 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.8 0.8 0.7 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.2 0.8 1.3 1.3
John Whelan 88.0% 59.8 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.7 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 0.7 1.0
Sam Levora 84.3% 113.5 0.1 0.1 0.1
Nathan Wadhwani 84.1% 154.1
Chandler Teigen 84.1% 154.4
Justin Janke 84.1% 205.6
Nathan Tadesse 84.1% 206.7


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Michael Williams 13.6 0.1 0.6 1.4 3.3 5.2 4.5 6.2 5.6 4.8 4.4 4.1 3.9 3.9 4.0 4.2 3.2 3.0 2.8 2.9 2.6 1.9 1.8 1.7 2.2 1.6
John Whelan 15.9 0.3 0.6 1.4 2.9 4.5 4.3 4.2 3.9 4.5 3.7 4.7 4.4 3.9 3.9 3.7 3.6 3.6 3.4 2.5 1.6 2.0 2.2 2.2 1.8
Sam Levora 30.5 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.7 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.4 2.5 1.9 2.6 2.2 2.6 3.2 3.1 3.0 2.2 3.1
Nathan Wadhwani 43.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.6 0.6 1.1 0.8 1.0 1.3
Chandler Teigen 44.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.9 0.8 1.1 1.2
Justin Janke 61.7 0.1
Nathan Tadesse 62.8




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 0.3% 100.0% 0.3 0.3 1
2 2.3% 100.0% 2.3 2.3 2
3 5.1% 100.0% 1.8 2.5 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.0 5.1 3
4 11.1% 100.0% 2.5 4.2 1.5 1.1 0.5 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 11.1 4
5 21.7% 96.3% 4.6 5.3 3.1 2.0 1.0 0.7 0.6 0.8 0.8 1.1 1.0 0.8 20.9 5
6 37.8% 90.9% 4.3 7.6 6.6 4.3 3.2 1.6 1.6 1.9 1.1 2.3 3.4 34.3 6
7 13.2% 70.0% 0.9 1.6 1.4 1.4 0.9 1.1 1.0 0.5 0.6 4.0 9.2 7
8 6.2% 17.7% 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.1 5.1 1.1 8
9 2.0% 2.0 9
10 0.7% 0.7 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
Total 100% 84.1% 0.3 2.3 1.8 4.9 9.3 11.3 12.7 10.7 6.8 5.8 3.5 3.8 4.1 2.9 4.2 16.0 2.5 81.6




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Georgetown 99.1% 1.0 1.0
Wisconsin 99.1% 1.0 1.0
Michigan State 92.4% 1.0 0.9
Boise State 89.6% 1.0 0.9
Colorado St. 85.2% 1.0 0.9
Eastern Kentucky 82.3% 1.0 0.8
North Carolina St. 81.2% 2.0 1.6
Providence 78.3% 1.0 0.8
Southern Utah 71.5% 1.0 0.7
Tulsa 68.5% 1.0 0.7
Texas 56.7% 1.0 0.6
Princeton 43.8% 1.0 0.4
Texas A&M 43.0% 2.0 0.9
Eastern Michigan 42.4% 2.0 0.8
Penn 36.5% 1.0 0.4
Illinois 32.4% 1.0 0.3
Washington 16.7% 3.0 0.5
Florida State 14.8% 2.0 0.3
Bradley 9.8% 1.0 0.1
Minnesota 8.2% 1.0 0.1
Columbia 1.7% 1.0 0.0
Air Force 0.6% 1.0 0.0
South Dakota St. 0.5% 1.0 0.0
Alabama 0.4% 1.0 0.0
Baylor 0.2% 1.0 0.0
California 0.1% 2.0 0.0
Purdue 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Total 13.7
Minimum 8.0
Maximum 22.0